Did Abu Hanifa Compare Abu Bakr's Faith to Satan's?

Response to: “Faith of Abu Bakr and Faith of Satan are One” — Abu Hanifa

Article being answered:

https://www.twelvershia.net/2016/04/02/response-to-faith-of-abu-bakar-and-faith-of-satan-are-one-abu-hanifa/

The quote is not a Shia fabrication.

It exists in Sunni sources.

But the fair wording is this:

We do not need to claim that Abu Hanifa meant “Abu Bakr is equal to Satan in status.”

Rather, the statement appears to be a consequence of Abu Hanifa’s controversial doctrine of iman, where iman is treated as basic affirmation and does not increase or decrease.

The problem with the Twelvershia defense is that they try to turn this statement into “praise of Abu Bakr.”

That is absurd.

Sunni scholars did not quote this statement under the virtues of Abu Bakr.

They quoted it under the ugly doctrines of the Murji’ah.

==============================

1. Main Sunni narration: al-Lalaka’i

Arabic:

أبو صالح الفراء محبوب بن موسى، قال: سمعت أبا إسحاق الفزاري، قال: قال أبو حنيفة:

إيمان أبي بكر وإيمان إبليس واحد، قال أبو بكر: يا رب، وقال إبليس: يا رب.

English:

Abu Salih al-Farra’ Mahbub ibn Musa said:

I heard Abu Ishaq al-Fazari say:

Abu Hanifa said:

“The faith of Abu Bakr and the faith of Iblis are one. Abu Bakr said: ‘My Lord,’ and Iblis said: ‘My Lord.’”

Reference:

al-Lalaka’i, Sharh Usul I‘tiqad Ahl al-Sunnah, report 1832.

Important point:

al-Lalaka’i placed this narration under the section:

سياق ما نقل من مقابح مذاهب المرجئة

“What has been transmitted of the ugly doctrines of the Murji’ah.”

So the source context itself refutes the anti-Shia excuse.

This was not quoted as a virtue of Abu Bakr.

It was quoted as a problematic doctrine of the Murji’ah.

==============================

2. Ibn al-Jawzi also transmits it

Arabic:

حدثنا محبوب بن موسى الأنطاكي قال: سمعت أبا إسحاق الفزاري يقول: سمعت أبا حنيفة يقول:

إيمان أبي بكر الصديق وإيمان إبليس واحد، قال إبليس: يا رب. وقال أبو بكر: يا رب.

قال أبو إسحاق: ومن كان من المرجئة ثم لم يقل هذا أنكر عليه قوله.

English:

Mahbub ibn Musa al-Antaki said:

I heard Abu Ishaq al-Fazari say:

I heard Abu Hanifa say:

“The faith of Abu Bakr al-Siddiq and the faith of Iblis are one. Iblis said: ‘My Lord,’ and Abu Bakr said: ‘My Lord.’”

Abu Ishaq said:

“Whoever is from the Murji’ah and does not say this has contradicted his own doctrine.”

Reference:

Ibn al-Jawzi, al-Muntazam fi Tarikh al-Muluk wa’l-Umam, events of year 150 AH.

Refutation point:

Abu Ishaq al-Fazari understood this as a consequence of Murji’i theology.

He did not present it as praise of Abu Bakr.

The point is not:

“Abu Bakr is like Satan in everything.”

The point is:

According to that definition of iman, mere recognition of Allah makes the iman of both “one” in essence.

That is exactly why Sunni hadith-oriented scholars objected to this doctrine.

==============================

3. Sunni discussions admit this report was used against Abu Hanifa’s view of iman

Arabic:

وساق عبد الله بن الإمام أحمد في السنة بسنده إلى أبي إسحاق الفزاري قال: كان أبو حنيفة يقول: إيمان إبليس وإيمان أبي بكر الصديق رضي الله عنه واحد، قال أبو بكر: يا رب، وقال إبليس: يا رب.

ثم قال أبو إسحاق: ومن كان من المرجئة ثم لم يقل هذا، انكسر عليه قوله.

English:

“Abdullah, the son of Imam Ahmad, narrated in al-Sunnah with his chain to Abu Ishaq al-Fazari that he said:

Abu Hanifa used to say:

‘The faith of Iblis and the faith of Abu Bakr al-Siddiq is one. Abu Bakr said: My Lord, and Iblis said: My Lord.’

Then Abu Ishaq said:

‘Whoever is from the Murji’ah and does not say this, his doctrine collapses.’”

Refutation point:

This is the balanced position:

Maybe Abu Hanifa did not intend to insult Abu Bakr.

But the statement exists in Sunni sources and was treated as a problematic result of his doctrine of iman.

So the anti-Shia article cannot simply call it “Shia distortion.”

==============================

4. Abu Hanifa’s own doctrine makes the issue understandable

A source summarizing Abu Hanifa’s doctrine quotes:

Arabic:

الإيمان لا يزيد ولا ينقص

English:

“Faith neither increases nor decreases.”

It also quotes:

Arabic:

أن الناس لا يختلفون في التصديق، ولا يتفاضلون فيه، وقد يتفاضلون في العمل.

English:

“People do not differ in tasdiq/affirmation and do not surpass one another in it; rather they differ in actions.”

And:

Arabic:

وإيمان أهل السماء والأرض لا يزيد ولا ينقص من جهة المؤمن به... والمؤمنون مستوون في الإيمان والتوحيد، ومتفاضلون في الأعمال.

English:

“The faith of the people of heaven and earth does not increase or decrease with respect to the object believed in… The believers are equal in faith and tawhid, but differ in actions.”

Reference:

Usul al-Din ‘inda al-Imam Abi Hanifah, quoting al-Fiqh al-Akbar and related Hanafi texts.

Refutation point:

This is exactly why critics said the doctrine leads to strange conclusions.

If iman is defined as basic affirmation and does not increase or decrease, then one may end up saying the iman of very different persons is “one” in essence.

That is not praise of Abu Bakr.

That is the consequence of a theological definition.

==============================

5. Twelvershia’s defense contradicts Abu Hanifa’s own Wasiyyah

The article says Iblis had “belief” in Allah, and therefore the statement only means belief in Allah.

But Abu Hanifa’s own Wasiyyah says mere knowledge is not iman.

Arabic:

الإيمان، وهو إقرار باللسان، وتصديق بالجنان، ومعرفة بالقلب، والإقرار وحده لا يكون إيمانا؛ لأنه لو كان إيمانا لكان المنافقون كلهم مؤمنين، وكذلك المعرفة لا تكون إيمانا، لأنها لو كانت إيمانا؛ لكان أهل الكتاب كلهم مؤمنين.

English:

“Faith is confession by the tongue, affirmation by the heart, and knowledge in the heart. Confession alone is not iman, because if it were iman, all hypocrites would be believers. Likewise, knowledge alone is not iman, because if it were iman, all the People of the Book would be believers.”

Reference:

Wasiyyat al-Imam Abi Hanifah.

Refutation point:

So the article’s “Iblis had belief in Allah” defense is weak.

If mere knowledge of Allah were iman, then the People of the Book and hypocrites would also be believers.

Abu Hanifa’s own Wasiyyah rejects that.

==============================

6. The Qur’an proves Iblis recognized Allah but was still a kafir

Iblis said:

Arabic:

قَالَ رَبِّ فَأَنظِرْنِي إِلَى يَوْمِ يُبْعَثُونَ

English:

“He said: My Lord, give me respite until the Day they are resurrected.”

Reference:

Qur’an 15:36.

But Allah still says:

Arabic:

إِلَّا إِبْلِيسَ أَبَىٰ وَاسْتَكْبَرَ وَكَانَ مِنَ الْكَافِرِينَ

English:

“Except Iblis; he refused, was arrogant, and was among the disbelievers.”

Reference:

Qur’an 2:34.

Refutation point:

Iblis saying “My Lord” is not saving iman.

So saying:

“Abu Bakr said: My Lord, and Iblis said: My Lord”

is not a virtue narration.

It is a theological problem.

==============================

7. The article’s “this is praise of Abu Bakr” claim is absurd

The article tries to say Abu Hanifa chose two extremes:

Abu Bakr as “peak of faith”

and Iblis as “peak of disbelief”

so this is somehow praise.

But the actual Sunni context says otherwise:

al-Lalaka’i placed it under the ugly doctrines of the Murji’ah.

Ibn al-Jawzi quoted it among criticisms of Abu Hanifa.

Abu Ishaq al-Fazari said a Murji’i who rejects this collapses his own doctrine.

Sunni discussions mention it as a consequence of Abu Hanifa’s doctrine of iman.

So no, this is not praise.

It is an embarrassing theological consequence.

==============================

Clean refutation line

The Shia claim should be worded carefully.

Do not say:

“Abu Hanifa meant Abu Bakr is Satan.”

Say:

“Sunni sources narrate that Abu Hanifa said the iman of Abu Bakr and Iblis is one, and Sunni hadith-oriented scholars used this as a criticism of Murji’i/Hanafi theology. Whether Abu Hanifa intended insult or only meant basic affirmation of Allah, the report is still real in Sunni books. The anti-Shia defense that this is praise of Abu Bakr is absurd, because Sunni sources themselves did not treat it as praise; they cited it among the problematic doctrines of the Murji’ah.”

==============================

Final verdict

The quote exists in Sunni sources.

It is not Shia fabrication.

It is not a virtue of Abu Bakr.

It is not a praise report.

At best, it is a consequence of Abu Hanifa’s controversial definition of iman.

At worst, it is a very ugly statement transmitted from him by Sunni critics.

Either way, Twelvershia’s defense fails when it pretends that comparing Abu Bakr’s iman with Iblis’s iman is somehow a compliment.